9-11 and Contrived
Conflict
An excellent example
of the contrived conflict is the
events of 9-11. 9-11 is
obviously a contrived incident. Only
six companies in the world can drop
buildings the size of the WTC into
their footprints. Building 7 was
“pulled” at the end of the
day, without any plane flying into
it. We now know, thanks to top
scientist Steven Jones, of Brigham
Young University, that thermate,
the commercial grade of thermite,
which is
mixed with sulfur, was used in
“cutter charges” to bring
the buildings down in almost a free
fall speed of seconds. The thermate reaction with the
steel burned white hot for six weeks underground. Burning
aviation fuel does not get anywhere
nearly hot enough to melt steel in
this way. For his efforts to
warn the nation, Jones was released
from the University employment.
9-11
Being Used to Build
the Image to the Beast
9-11
is now being used to build a
totalitarian state, the image of the
beast of Revelation 13:15. In
addition, who was sitting at the
reigns of power to accomplish this?
The power of the Order of Skull and
Bones, our very government.
A Threat on the Order
of Pearl Harbor
“In a 1997
Council on Foreign Relations study
entitled The Grand Chessboard:
American Primacy and its Geostatic
Imperatives, Brzezinski clearly
showed why he and his fellow CFR
members believed it necessary for the
United States to maintain a military
presence in the Near East.’ [A]
s America becomes an increasingly
multicultural society, it may find it
more difficult to fashion a consensus
on foreign policy issues,’ he
wrote, ‘except in the
circumstance of a truly massive
and widely perceived direct external
threat.’ He was explicit that such
a threat would need to be on the
order of the one that involved
America in the last world war.
‘The attitude of the
American public toward the external
projection of American power has been
much more ambivalent. The
public supported America’s
engagement in World War II largely
because of the shock effect of the
Japanese attack on Pearl
Harbor,’ Brzezinski wrote.”
–Jim Marrs, The Terror Conspiracy:
Deception, 9/11, and the Loss of
Liberty. New York:
Disinformation, 2006, p. 181.
(Emphasis mine)
Gestapo Intercepted
Conversation Between Churchill and
Roosevelt Eleven Days Before Pearl
Harbor
Of course, Roosevelt
knew in advance of the attack on
Pearl Harbor. In 1948, the
interrogation of Germany’s
Gestapo Chief Heinrich Mueller, based
on secret files, revealed that
Germans in Holland, on November 26,
1941, eleven days before Pearl
Harbor, intercepted a private,
trans-Atlantic telephone conversation
between Roosevelt and Churchill, in
which Churchill informed Roosevelt of
the coming attack, based on specific
agents within the Japanese military
and foreign service, as well as their
broken code.
Roosevelt: “A
Japanese Attack On Us…Would
Fulfill Two of the Most Important
Requirements of Our Policy”
Churchill stated,
“I can assure you that their
goal is the (conversation broken)
fleet in Hawaii, at Pearl
Harbor.” After finding out the
nature of the intelligence, Roosevelt
responded, “The obvious
implication is that the Japs are
going to do a Port Arthur on us at
Pearl Harbor. Do you concur? Later in
the conversation Roosevelt said,
“A Japanese attack on us, which
would result in war between-and
certainly you as well would certainly
fulfill two of the most important
requirements of our policy.” –Jim
Marrs, Terror Conspiracy,
pp. 355, 356.
