Let There Be
Difference…
page 3 of 3
Discipleship’s
Internal Frame of Reference of Faith
If you study closely
the gospel, you will see that Jesus
confronts this issue of attack on the
soul at the very basis of the call to
discipleship. When He calls, the
person must leave, he must hate,
Jesus said, all,-- all other people,
even family members, even spouse,
father, mother, wife, children, and even
his own life, or he cannot be
Christ’s disciple. Luke 14:26.
Then he must take up his cross-the
cross of shame, rejection, and
reproach. The internal submission of
the soul to Christ must transcend all
that one sees with the eye. The soul
now lives by faith, not by sight. He
operates from the internal reference
point of mystical union with Christ,
His kingdom, His voice, His Word,
rather than being influenced by any
external force around him. In
addition, the disciple must be
prepared for universal rejection,
hatred, reproach, and shame, because
he is now living out of his internal
reference to the unseen Christ,
rather than being in submission to
the group around him.
The
Socializing of all of Life, Including
State and Church
Answering the call of
discipleship is the basis of
Christianity. The individuality that
takes place in answering the call of
discipleship is the basis of the
freedoms of our Anglo-Saxon Common
Law and our Constitution, all of
which is becoming a dead “piece
of paper” as the very reference
point to which it was
addressed-namely, individual freedom
in discipleship-has been removed in
the soul due to dialectical praxis.
The same with the
church-it has become an institution
with the focus on the external
ecclesiastical hierarchy, rather than
on the worship of the unseen God.
This is fundamental to ecumenism, to
Church Growth, to NLP, to the New
Theology, to the host of variations
of apostasy. At the root of it lies
submission to the hierarchy of man
rather than the internal submission
in faith to the unseen world of the
true, Biblical Christ, and His
kingdom. Our entire culture has
shifted off the world of individual
faith with the internal reference
point of conviction, to external
fitting in with the group-be it the
nation, the church, the classroom, or
the church board.
The Person
Maintaining the Authority of
Christ’s Name is Regarded with
Disbelief
The person who still
maintains his ground of the internal
reference point of faith in
discipleship under the authority
of Christ’s name is regarded
with disbelief. How can he be so
disagreeable, out of touch, so
“unloving”, so maladjusted,
as to not fit in with the general
consensus as change is brought in?
100 years ago, the servant of the
Lord wrote these words:
“The prevailing
spirit of our time is one of
infidelity and apostasy-a spirit of
avowed illumination because of a
knowledge of truth, but in reality of
the blindest presumption. Human
theories are exalted and placed where
God and His law should be. Satan
tempts men and women to disobey, with
the promise that in disobedience they
will find liberty and freedom that
will make them as gods. There is seen
a spirit of opposition to the plain
word of God, of idolatrous exaltation
of human wisdom above divine
revelation. Men have allowed their
minds to become so darkened and
confused by conformity to worldly
customs and influences that they seem
to have lost all power to
discriminate between light and
darkness, truth and error. So far
have they departed from the right way
that they hold the opinions of a few
philosophers, so called, to be
trustworthier than the truths of the
Bible. The entreaties and promises of
God’s word, its threatenings
against disobedience and
idolatry-these seem powerless to melt
their hearts. A faith such as
actuated Paul, Peter, and John they
regard as old-fashioned, mystical,
and unworthy of the intelligence of
modern thinkers.” PK
178.
Today, dialectical
praxis has almost engulfed humanity.
Dialectical
Praxis Can Rear Its Head in the Most
Unsuspecting Places
The issue of internal
versus external reference points can
arise anywhere. In the most
unsuspecting environments,
dialectical praxis is used to break
down the conscience and conviction of
souls, often in order to maintain and
establish the authority of a
hierarchy of power.
Re-educating
Conscience from the Internal
Conviction of Faith to External
Hierarchy and Group
In a revolutionary
cell in Communist China, dialectical
praxis was used to
“convert” the dissident to
the principles of communism. In a
classroom, it will be used to
eliminate conviction regarding moral
absolutes. In a church setting, it
will uphold “God,” while at
the same time work to extinguish the authority
of God in life manifested in
individual conviction in true
discipleship, and re-educate the
conscience to submission to the
church hierarchy. Remember that Satan
is an expert at quoting Scripture.
“Satan is an expert in quoting
Scripture, placing his own
interpretations upon passages, by
which he hopes to cause us to
stumble.” GC 530. In the Second
Temptation of Christ in the
Wilderness, Satan used Scripture to
countenance deception: “As Jesus
before used the word of God to
sustain His faith, the tempter now
uses it to countenance his
deception.” DA 124.
You Will
Encounter Dialectical Praxis Sooner
or Later
It requires some
intellectual effort to understand
dialectical materialism, or diaprax
for short, but it is crucial, for
today it has penetrated every level
of life, education, government, and
the church, and it will ultimately
impact massively on your life, no
matter how sheltered you may think
you are, for the sure Word of the
Lord, it is bringing on the Great
Tribulation. Fundamental to the Skull
and Bones society, for example, it is
the Hegelian dialectic.
The Ruthless
Application of Dialectical Praxis
Against Individual Conviction
Fundamental to the
elimination of conscience and dissent
in the church is dialectical praxis.
Dialectical praxis is used in and out
of church board meetings, for
example, to utterly exterminate all
opposition to the Jesuit plan of the
utter extermination of Protestantism
by bringing congregations into full
submission to ecclesiastical
authority and then controlling the
hierarchy from the top down. When it
is used upon church members who would
dare to resist the authoritarianism
of the blast from the bottomless pit,
the resisters, unless they know what
the weapon is that is being used
against them, are left reeling, in
utter confusion, devastated, with all
resistance ground up, shattered, and
spat out in little pieces.
A Short
History of Dialectical Praxis
For Hundreds
of Years Dialectics Have Been the
Special Province of the Jesuits Order
When the Jesuits
developed communism [1600 to 1750 in
Paraguay] the use of the dialectic
found new horizons and development.
In 1789, under their front
organization, the Illuminati, the
Jesuits launched a new manifestation
of satanic power in Europe, the
French Revolution, spoken of in
Revelation 11 as a power arising out
of the bottomless pit. The world
would never be the same again. Ellen
White would write in Education 228
that the worldwide dissemination of
the teachings of the French
Revolution would bring on the Great
Tribulation.
The Hegelian
Dialectic
Georg Wilhelm
Friedrich Hegel (1770-1831), a German
philosopher, developed the dialectic
into a new format to utterly confuse
the way the brain functions. He
developed the dialectic into thesis,
antithesis, and synthesis, to bring
about massive, fundamental, and
virtually irreversible change.
Dialectical
Materialism or Marxism
The Jesuits seized
upon this new development of the
dialectic and applied it to their
ideology of communism. The result was
the codification of communism in a
refined and defined manifesto by the
Jew, Karl Marx (1818-1883), called
Marxism, often called dialectical
materialism, in 1848. The immediate
result was 50 revolutions in Europe,
as chaos swept the European
continent. One year later, in 1849,
Ellen White would have her Hold,
Hold, Hold vision.
Lenin
considered Hegelian Dialectics
Richest, Most Profound
Lenin wrote, “As
the most comprehensive and profound
doctrine of development, and the
richest in content, Hegelian
dialectics were considered by Marx
and Engels the greatest achievement
of classical German philosophy.”
Lenin, Collected Works, vol. 24, p.
53, quoted in David A. Nobel,
Understanding the Times, p. 298.
Marxism
Penetrates Czarist Russia in the
1870s, Jesuits Readmitted in 1922
By the 1870s, Marxism
had penetrated Russia, with the
slipping past of the Czar’s
censors of Marx Das Kapital. By
the end of the 1870s, virtually every
student in Russian universities was a
Marxist and the nation was ripe for
revolution. In 1917, the revolution
came under Vladimir Lenin. Within a
year, the Czar, the ancient enemy of
Rome and defender of Eastern and
Russian Orthodoxy was assassinated.
By 1922, the Jesuits were readmitted
to Russia, a delegation of Jesuits
under the leadership of Edmund Walsh
from Georgetown University paid a
visit to Russia, and by 1925, the
Jesuit-trained Stalin was firmly in
command.
Dialectical
Praxis Fundamental to Russian
Takeover
Fundamental to the
takeover in Russia was the work of
the Russian university-trained
Marxist intellectuals who led small
groups all over Russia, using
dialectical praxis. Praxis, is
Latin for practice, or practical
application, in this case, the
application of Marxist dialectic.
After years of the application of
dialectical praxis in factories and
farms of Russia, in ten days that
shook the world, Marxist dialectical
praxis seized control of the largest
national land mass on earth which
would become the Union of Soviet
Socialist Republics, or the Soviet
Union for short.
Lenin Explains
the Hegelian Dialectic
Lenin was the most
fond of the Marxist/Hegelian
dialectic, for it used to utterly
exterminate all opposition, grinding
up the minds and hearts and souls of
all those opposed to the
revolutionary concepts. Lenin wrote:
“Dialectics
reveals that development proceeds by
a process, in which the given
situation-or thing, or idea-always
gives birth to its exact antithesis,
opposite; and in doing so doing
creates a tension, a struggle, which
becomes the motive power for change,
progress, as the antithesis struggles
with its mother, the thesis, until
out of the struggle a new stage in
history-be it of the situation, of
the thing, or of the idea-is reached,
namely the synthesis-and this, in
turn, becomes the starting point of
another round, by giving birth once
more to its opposite.”
–Lenin Collected Works, vol, 38,
p. 358, quoted in Nobel,
Understanding the Times, p. 140.
Dialectical
Materialism Takes Over China in the
1950s
By 1950, dialectical
materialism, or Marxism, was seizing
China under the Yale-educated Mao Tse
Tung. Fundamental to Mao’s
Marxist revolution were cell groups,
used to brain wash and overpower all
opposition. Jesuit worker-priests in
China joined the communist cell
groups. (Malachi Martin, The Jesuits,
289, 290.)
In GC31
(1964-1966) Jesuits Decide to Utterly
Transform All Human Society With
Hegelian Dialectic and Teilhardian
Pantheism
From 1964 to 1966, the
Jesuits held their General
Congregation 31 at the Gesu in Rome.
The result was the launching of the
Jesuit Pierre Teilard de
Chardin’s pantheism and Marxism
in America and around the world to
utterly transform all of human
society. The Soviets would place the
books of the Jesuit Pierre Teihard de
Chardin “on display with those
of Marx and Lenin in Moscow’s
Hall of Atheism.” –Malachi
Martin, The Jesuits, 290.
Dialectical
Praxis Takes Over America
The Jesuit Revolution
resulting from GC31 was what has come
to be known as the Hippie Revolution
in America. Its pantheism would
create the sexual revolution,
crumbing Protestantism and Protestant
morality forever in America.
Fundamental to this Jesuit revolution
of the 1960s was the massive
introduction of the Hegelian
Dialectic into an entire generation.
It produced the “generation
gap” as parents could no longer
understand the way that their
children thought. Children left their
parents homes and society and formed
hippie communes. The Jesuits, such as
the Jesuit McSorley, carefully
oversaw the whole process, which
produced Bill and Hillary Clinton,
and Pastor Rick Warren as well, of
the Saddleback Church, whose Purpose
driven Life has sold over 20
million copies and sweep the
Structure.
Dialectical
Praxis Sweeps the Churches, Pastoral
Training, Education, Government, and
Military
Jesuit dialectical
praxis is the fundamental teaching of
the Jesuit Liberation Theology that
exploded throughout North and South
America in the 1970s and following.
Jesuit dialectical praxis immediately
swept education, the churches, the
government, the military, and all
before it. It penetrated everywhere.
Pastors in training were taught it in
Human Relations workshops, in how to
develop consensus and eliminate
conscience and conviction so that
there could be a church unity based,
not on the fear of God and the truth,
but upon submission to the
“group,” the social unit,
or, as it was put in Russia and
China, the commune.
Dialectical
Praxis Especially Used to Eliminate
Dissent as Change is Brought In
Dialectical praxis
found especial favor with
universities involved in pastoral
training for church growth, with
salesmen, with businessmen, with any
profession that desired to control
the mind of its opposition, and
crumple dissent. Of course, there is
no discipline like psychology for the
control of the human mind. The church
growth movement even introduced
“cell groups,” a concept
that had been used in Communist
Chinese brain-washing, had spread in
the wake of communism to North Korea,
spread to the megachurchs of South
Korea where it was used to implement
unity and eliminate dissent, and from
there to the Church Growth movement
in America, where it entered the
Structure’s Church Growth
movement.
Creator of NLP
Involved in Dialectical Praxis
Richard Bandler, one
of the creators of Neuro-Linguistic
Programming, or NLP, for short, was
deeply involved in the promotion of
dialectical praxis. NLP would sweep
the Structure in the 1990s, as
hundreds of pastors were trained in
it in the Calling and Caring Labs I
and II, developed by Dr. John Savage.
Hundreds were sent on to far more
secret advanced NLP training in the
hard-core NLP classes, for the
Calling and Caring Labs only had
about six hours of NLP in them. The
pastors and conference men then
trained their elders, and used it to
control those resisting the New
Theology and the invasion of
pantheism.
Dialectical
Praxis Can Appear in Unexpected
Terrain
Ministries can pick up
dialectical praxis in academic
training where it is rife, and train
its ministry workers in its
principles. A man does not have to go
through higher education to imbibe of
diaprax. He can easily learn it from
others at a ministry-or, off the
street. And then, dialectical praxis,
implemented by the agents of this
ministry, can use these techniques to
silence dissent in churches they
operate. Thus, the same principles as
used by the Jesuits make their way
into new terrain, and many are
overthrown. (Daniel 11:41).
For four and half
centuries, the Jesuits have been
masters of dialectics. Since their
deployment of Jesuitical communism,
they have added praxis to
their dialectic. This had now been
packaged and unleashed in academia
through most of the twentieth
century.
Stay Tuned to
Part II
How An
Ecclesiastical Hierarchy Silences a
Dissenting Movement Using Hegelian
Dialectics
page 1 : page 2 : page 3
